florianb a scris:Ma faci sa rid. Ti-am raspuns la aberatia ta:Armata romana nu a participat la operatiuni militare pe teritoriul Poloniei. Esti prost informat.
Pentru ca esti total pe dinafara, nu te voi lasa sa rizi nici de polonezi. Vezi aici:
"...Despite media reports of the time, particularly in respect of the Battle of Krojanty, no cavalry charges were made by the Polish Cavalry against German tanks in War World Two.
...Although the cavalrymen retained their sabres, after 1937 the lance was dropped and it was issued to cavalrymen as a weapon of choice only. Instead, the cavalry units were equipped with modern armament, including 75 mm guns (asta e de cimp, nu AT), tankettes, 37mm AT guns, 40mm AA guns, anti-tank rifles and other pieces of modern weaponry.
...During the campaign, the brigades were distributed among the Polish armies and served as mobile reserves. In this role, the Polish cavalry proved itself a successful measure in filling the gaps in the front and covering the withdrawal of friendly units.
.......[cavalry] was used as a mobile reserve of the Polish armies and was using mostly infantry tactics: the soldiers dismounted before the battle and fought as a standard (yet fast) infantry."
"Charge of Krojanty where elements of the Polish cavalry (18th Pomeranian Uhlans Regiment) attacked German 76th Infantry Regiment (Colonel Hans Gollnick) of 20th Motorised Division under Lt. Gen. Mauritz von Wiktorin, which operated on the left (northern) flank of XIX Panzer Corps under Gen. Heinz Guderian.. During the attack the cavalry received machine gun fire from German armoured personnel carriers stationed nearby and were forced to retreat. Delay of the German advance is claimed as successful completion of the Poles' mission.
Happening on the first day of the war, it was one of its first clashes, and part of the larger Battle of Tuchola Forest. The incident became notable as reporters visiting the site soon after saw the dead bodies of horses and cavalrymen which lead to false reports of Polish cavalry attacking German tanks. Nazi propaganda took advantage of this, suggesting that the Poles attacked intentionally, believing that the German still had the dummy tanks the Versailles treaty restrictions had permitted them. The scene of Polish cavalry charging the Panzers with their lances has become a myth."
"...The same day, German war correspondents were brought to the battlefield, together with two journalists from Italy. They were shown the corpses of Polish cavalrymen and their horses, as well as German tanks that had arrived at the place after the battle. One of the Italian correspondents, Indro Montanelli, sent home an article, in which he described the bravery and heroism of Polish soldiers, who charged German tanks with sabres and lances. Although such a charge did not happen and there were no tanks used during the combat, the myth was used by German propaganda during the war. German propaganda magazine Die Wehrmacht reported on 13 September that the Poles had gravely underestimated German weapons, as Polish propaganda had suggested that German armored vehicles were only covered with sheet metal, leading to a grotesque attack. After the end of World War II it was still used by Soviet propaganda as an example of stupidity of pre-war Polish commanders, who allegedly did not prepare their country for the war and instead wasted the blood of their soldiers.
"George Parada states:[8]
Contrary to German propaganda, Polish cavalry brigades never charged tanks with their sabres or lances as they were equipped with anti-tank weapons such as 37 mm Bofors wz.36 (exported to UK as Ordnance Q.F. 37 mm Mk I) antitank guns, that could penetrate 26 mm of armour at 600 m at 30 degrees. The cavalry brigades were in the process of being reorganized into motorized brigades."
"...Another weapon was anti-tank rifle model 1935 (karabin przeciwpancerny wz. 35). Its calibre was 7.92 mm and it could penetrate 15 mm of armour at 300 m at 30 degrees. In 1939, the Germans were mainly equipped with the small Panzer I and Panzer II models which were vulnerable to such weapons."
Majoritatea trupelor blindate ale armatelor occidentale au fost la origine trupe de cavalerie transformate in unitati blindate-motorizate. O parte din ele si-au pastrat titulatura oficiala, de unitate de cavalerie. Polonia era pe aceeasi cale.
E vai de elevii sau studentii israelieni care invata istorie cu asa profesori. (il includ aici si pe bengal).
Chiar scrii. Imi esti dator o bere ca te invat istorie.
Asta e aiureala, lupini! In timpul dezmembrarii Romaniei de catre vecini, la putere era regimul lui Carol al II-lea, anglo-francofil, care tocmai datorita acestor pierderi teritoriale abdica si fuge din tara. Nu regimul lui Antonescu.
Imi esti dator si tu o bere.
Tu domnule ai putea sa fi un politist ca sti dumneata, politisti merg in perechi ca unu stie sa scrie si al doilea stie sa citeasca.
Tu esti ila care stie sa scrie ca de citit esti cam ba... Din ce am scris se intelege ca Romania si Polonia au facut uz de cavalerie intr-un razboi in care unitatile motorizate si tancurile au fost in prima linie. Te-am indreptat unde sa vezi pe cavalerii Romani pe frontul de est. Tu te-ai cam infundat in explicatii fara rost.