ironic a scris:Aici exista problema cea mare. Cu un link dat catre un blog oarecare, se decide capacitatea de rationalizare a unui om care si-a dedicat viata stiintei, fiind un simplu autodidact si cheltuindu-si ultimul banut pentru a-si indeplini destinul. Daca nu a facut nu stiu cate facultati care sa-l propulseze in societatea stiintifica, nu are nici un cuvand de spus. Mai de graba credem un om de stiinta care a dormitat ani intregi pe bancile facultatilor de renume, ocrotit de banii familiei instarite.
Inteleg cum poate parea aiurea o contrare de genul asta si vreau sa intelegi ca sunt super de acord cu ideea de autodidact (si eu sunt autodidact).
Stiu de asemenea si ca multi oameni de stiinta au fost contrazisi la vremea lor, unii dintre ei au fost considerati nebuni.
Cred si eu intr-o academicizare stupida a stiintei unde daca nu ai tzspe acreditari nu prea esti luat in serios.
In acelasi timp am incredere ca nu toti oamenii de stiinta sunt presionati sa exprime o parere "oficiala" exista destul de multa libertate in acest domeniu.
Problema, cum o vad eu este cauzata de faptul ca cei care stiu despre ce vorbesc in domeniul in care Nassim Haramein are pretentia ca actioneaza, nu-l sustin. Asta mie imi spune ca este mai probabil sa vorbeasca prostii.
Nu poti scoate ceva intr-un context cu totul transformat. Toata suma cunostintelor umane sunt interconectate. Daca ignori cunostinte prezente sau pur si simplu nu le stii... atunci ce faci nu este stiinta ci speculatie.
Ca sa intelegi mai bine care este problema, uite o mica poveste care o explica destul de bine:
Imagine you grew up speaking fluent Mandarin, as well as English. And you'd spent a lot of time in China, living among people in many different parts of the country.One day, probably somewhere in the US of A, you come across someone giving public lectures on how to understand Mandarin. Lots of people are interested, it seems, because Mandarin is still quite alien to most people in English-speaking countries, yet it's a language that may prove increasingly valuable to learn for the future. You're curious, so you take a look.
What you see is someone making stereotypical Chinese-sounding noises. He utters words that sound vaguely Chinese, and explains what he thinks they mean. He tells his audience that he's studied this language for many many years, and has learned things that most teachers of Mandarin would never even realise. You do recognise some of his words, but they're not put together in a way that makes much sense to you.
You ask his students, who proudly tell you that this is the true Mandarin, and that what they teach in language schools is flawed. When you take issue with this, they insist that obviously that's because you're only able to see what you've been taught, and you've never thought outside of this box, and if you could see the bigger picture then you'd understand what he was saying and what a revolutionary understanding of the language it was. And the reason no other teachers of Mandarin teach this way is because of a massive conspiracy to put down creativity and keep the language in the control of the elite. Or something like that.
Anyway, who are you to tell people how they should speak Mandarin?
He has thousands of followers, and they all happily believe this is the true Mandarin. What do you do?
Nu era un calificativ general la adresa ta, ci un comentariu punctual al unor fraze.