România
Roportal.ro

Fericirea

Început de Observ, Mar 8 nov 2005 · 910 răspunsuri · 111.326 vizualizări

jet li486 mesaje#481

POVERTY

One day a father of a very wealthy family took his son on a trip to the country with the firm purpose of showing his son how poor people live.

They spent a couple of days and nights on the farm of what would be considered a very poor family.

On their return from their trip, the father asked his son, "How was the trip?"

" It was great, Dad."

"Did you see how poor people live?" the father asked.

"Oh yeah," said the son.

"So, tell me, what did you learn from the trip?" asked the father.

The son answered: "I saw that we have one dog and they had four. We have a pool that reaches to the middle of our garden and they have a creek that has no end. We have imported lanterns in our garden and they have the stars at night. Our patio reaches to the front yard and they have the whole horizon. We have a small piece of land to live on and they have fields that go beyond our sight. We have servants who serve us, but they serve others. We buy our food, but they grow theirs. We have walls around our property to protect us, they have friends to protect them."

The boy's father was speechless.

Then his son added, "Thanks, Dad, for showing me how poor we are."

Once I was staying with my mother in London. At the time she was the housekeeper for a very wealthy Canadian who lived in a luxury flat just off Hyde Park. They all went off for a while, and I had the flat to myself. There I was in London, living in this luxurious flat with two huge color television sets and all the food I could possibly eat! I had enough money for whatever I wanted, lots of records, lots of everything. But I was so bored!

I told myself, "Please remember this. If you are ever tempted to think that physical comfort gives happiness, remember this."

But then, another time I was staying in a cave, not my cave but another cave, which was very small. It was so small that you couldn't stand up in it, with a tiny box you could only just sit in, and that was the bed as well. It was full of fleas, so I was covered in flea bites. You had to go half a mile down a very steep track to bring up water. There was also almost no food at all, and it was hot. But I was in bliss. I was so happy. It was a very holy place, and the people there were wonderful. Although from a physical point of view the situation was difficult, so what! The mind was happy. I remember that whole place as being bathed in golden light. Do you see what I mean?"

http://buddhism.kalachakranet.org/resource...rt_stories.html

Vedem oameni care "nu au niciodata indeajuns". Ei strang toate aceste lucruri pentru ca sunt saraci spiritual.

Sunt si oameni care traiesc cu aproape nimic dar au un sat, o comunitate si sunt fericiti. Sunt oameni la oras care sunt un pic mai "bogati" dar sunt prinsi in masina moderna , nu au nimic in jurul lor, intr-adevar se poate spune despre ei ca sunt saraci

epicurian27 mesaje#483
Mirada-Dicovici a scris:
Fericirea isi pierde farmecul prin analiza si teoretizarea ei. La fel si tristetea. Ea trebuie sa fie o stare naturala ( fie de moment - fie de durata ) si ca sa aiba sens trebuie pastrata acea taina sfanta care o apoteozeaza.

nu sint de acord cu tine. pt. oamenii metropolelor lumii noastre, fericirea nu poate fi inteleasa si nu poate fi 'gustata' decit atunci cind este inteleasa. provocarile cotidianului acestor timpuri sint atit de numeroase si de incrincenate, incit in suflet si in cuget nu mai este loc pt. linistea si pacea necesare sublimarii acestei 'sfinte taine'. in plus intelegerea acestei taine nu ne este tuturora la indemina, iar 'stofa' de intelept care cuprinde fara sa aiba nevoie sa inteleaga, nu o avem cu totii.

daca am face un sondaj cu singura intrebare "ce este fericirea", asa cum pe aceasta lista exista atitea pareri, la fel s-ar obtine si la interpretarea raspunsurilor. ce denota acest lucru? simplu, ca fiecare intelege in maniera proprie fericirea. ori, o notiune care se refera la un anumit aspect al trairilor noastre, nu poate avea intelesuri si continuturi care sa cuprinda un spectru de la 'plus-infinit' la 'minus-infinit'. ceea ce inseamna ca celor mai multi dintre noi, oameni obisnuiti ai acestui timp stressant, nu ne este clar ce cuprinde si inseamna fericirea, aruncind in acelasi cos al definitiei, trairi si intelegeri adiacente, congruente si complementare, dar nu si exacte. sint de acord ca nu poate exista o definire absoluta (in afara neantului-etern nimic nefiind absolut), dar spectrul de definire nu poate fi in niciun caz atit de diferit si diversificat precum am subliniat.

concluzia mea nu poate fi decit ca a intelege, a cuprinde si a experimenta fericirea autentica este un proces care obligatoriu trebuie sa treaca prin cunoastere. cum ajungem la acest stadiu, este o alta problema, si de ea s-au ocupat filozofia si religia. fiecare cu alta masura si ajungind in consecinta la alte definiri. dar ca sa fie experimentata pe deplin si sublimata prin trairi, fericirea trebuie sa fie mai intii inteleasa, altfel nu este fericire, ci speranta, dorinta, nazuinta, mister, misticism.

← Înapoi la Filozofie