Adrian_Daniel_Tm a scris:Cu toate ca in 500 de ani e loc destul pt ca o traditie sa prinda radacini eu zic ca Mamaliga nu e o mancare traditional romaneasca.
Porumbul a fost adus in Europa din America deci nu cu mai mult de 500 de ani in urma, pana sa prinda in Romania culturi vaste de porumb au trecut ceva ani, m-ar surprinde ca razesii lui Stefan sa fi gustat vreodata mamaliga desi erau contemporani cu C. Columb.....................
Ceva pareri, revendica cineva maliguta in numele mancarurilor traditionale romanesti ?
Mamaliga ce in limba italiana se numeste Polenta,i-si are originile cu mii de ani in urma in inceputurile bucatariei italiene numai ca era facuta din alte ingrediente.Porumbul a fost folosit pentru a face mamaliga,dupa 1492 cand Cristoforo Colombo sa intors din America si a adus cu el diverse legume printre care si porumb.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polenta#Bibliography
Tari care gatesc mamaliga in diferite variatii.
Although the word is borrowed into English from Italian, the dish (under various names) is popular in Italian, Slovenian, Savoyard, Swiss, Austrian, Portuguese, Bosnian, Croatian (where it is called Palenta or, in Dalmatia, pura), Cuban, American, Hungarian (where it is called puliszka), Serbian (kačamak in Serbian), Romanian (where it is called mămăligă), Bulgarian, Georgian, Corsican, Argentine, Uruguayan, Brazilian, Peruvian, Venezuelan, Haitian, Mexican and Turkish (typically from the Black Sea region, known as mamalika) cuisines, and it is a traditional staple food throughout much of Northern Italy.
Deci?
