Sch a scris:nop
s-a dovedit falsitatea evolutionosmului...n-au dovezi...
deci ramane doar la statutul de teorie...
P.S.:cel mai tare m-a amuzat cazul lucy
s-a dovedit ca de fapt nu s-a gasit 60 % din trup ci numai 20% , mandibula era de cimpanzeu...si restul corpului a dovedit ca era un cimpanzeu...dar dragii cercetatori aveau nevoie de fonduri ..si...au mai bagat o tampenie pe piata...pentru creduli
Ati jucat, cand erati mici telefonul fara fir? Stiti cum se distorsioneaza informatia cand se transmite fara un control de la o persoana la alta. Probabil ca la fel s-a petrecut si in aceasta situatie, care a reusit sa-l amuze pe Sch.
Probabil ca cineva a citit despre omul de Pildown, intr-adevar un fals recunoscut, apoi despre Lucy, le-a amestecat bine, apoi cei care au citit nu au inteles mai nimic dar au ajuns la concluzia de mai sus.
In ceea ce o priveste pe Lucy, a fost intr-adevar o controversa starnita, in acelasi mod, de o neintelegere legata de o declaratie a Dr. Donald Johanson care referindu-se la un os de genunchi apartinand unui alt Australopithecus Affarensis, si fiind intrebat la ce distanta de Lucy se gasea a raspuns: "la 60-70 de metri mai adanc si la 2-3 kilometri distanta.
"Q. How far away from Lucy did you find the knee?
A. Sixty to seventy meters lower in the strata and two to three kilometers away."
Creationistii au preluat fara sa se gandeasca prea mult aceasta afirmatie, spunand ca de fapt genunchiul lui Lucy a fost gasit departe de restul scheletului!!!!
Iar asta ar fi o proba impotriva evolutionismului.
La protestele Dr. Johanson, majoritatea s-au dovedit surzi, putini recunoscandu-si greseala, unii continuand si astazi sa prezinte inclusiv pe Internet versiunea eronata:
"At least eighteen creationists have made this bogus claim. Three have never responded in any way to questions about it (Girouard, Menton, Willis). Another two have not responded to further inquiries (Brown, McAllister). Only five have shown a willingness to discuss the matter (Chittick, the Nuttings, Sharp, Taylor), but one (Chittick) cut off correspondence. Four have agreed that the claim was in error and agreed to stop making it (Hovind, McAllister, Sharp, Taylor), and two agreed to stop making it if further investigation showed that the claim was bogus (the Nuttings) but have continued to repeat it. One (Arndts) has indicated a willingness to believe that the claim is in error but no interest in researching further or offering a correction because the article in which he made the claim just used it as an example of a type of error in reasoning. One (LaHaye) has insisted that the claim is not in error, but agreed to stop making it at the request of the Institute for Creation Research. Three (Baugh, Huse, Mehlert) have not yet been contacted for comment. One (Brown) now denies having made the claim at all. Only three (Menton, Morris, Sharp) have issued public corrections or clarifications."
Genunchiul lui Lucy
Morala: aveti grija care sunt sursele de informatii. Internetul este comod, dar pot sa apara suficiente informatii false. Nu luati decizii pana nu verificati cu mare atentie corectitudinea acestor informatii.
restu` de la sine :flowers: