Nu se pot opri it-istii?
O fi.
Dar stii cine se pot opri si deja o cam fac?
Inginerii.
Si sunt solutii.
Daca o dam in extrem, oamenii au pornit razboaie si au castigat. Dar razboiul cu natura nu il vor castiga.
Nu au cum.
Vor trebui sa cedeze si o vor face. Poate mai tarziu, dar nu neaparat niciodata.
Unii deja s-au aliat cu natura. Nu mai e ca acum 30 de ani.
Oamenii devin tot mai constienti.
Si citit sau nu despre Totnes?
Diferenta dintre mine si tine consta in faptul ca in timp ce tu devii tot mai constient de posibila iminenta a tragicului ( nu o poti garanta), eu devin tot mai constienta ca exista solutii.
Si nu sunt singura.
Asa ca de ce sa ma linistesc eu ar fi o solutie? Doar pentru ca a fost pentru tine o non-solutie?
En fin.
Ps: despre incalzirea globala.
S
Ca si consecinta principala a efectului de sera - este modificarea fortata a circuitului apei pe pamant. Dar aceasta contribuie din greu si hidrocentralele.
Citeste despre canalul cerului - proiect al chinezilor, incognito, in Tibet.
Si mult nu il mai pot camufla mai ales datorita cutremurelor pe care le provoaca.
Deci primul pas e sa fim mai atenti la modul in care influentam circuitul apei.
Alte cateva exemple CONCRETE de comunitati urbane verzi.
http://www.profit.ro/povesti-cu-profit/sfaturi-cu-profit/top-7-cele-mai-verzi-orase-inteligente-din-europa-14472829
Despre moneda complementara WIR din Elvetia
https://www.google.ro/amp/s/realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2012/04/19/the-swiss-wir-or-how-to-defeat-the-money-power/amp/
Si de ce o noua ordine mondiala. Adica o altfel de democratie?
,,Democracy is not the problem. Voting is the problem. Where is the reasoned voice of the people in all this? Where do citizens get the chance to obtain the best possible ''
,,Imagine having to develop a system today that would express the will of the people. Would it really be a good idea to have them all queue up at polling stations every four or five years with a bit of card in their hands and go into a dark booth to put a mark next to names on a list, names of people about whom restless reporting had been going on for months in a commercial environment that profits from restlessness?''
Si solutia?
Chiar daca pare absurda, ganditi inainte sa criticati - tragerea la sorti.
Multi politicieni pornesc cu idealism la drum dar sfarsesc prin a deveni corupti iar oamenilor li s-a inoculat credinta ca singura puterepe care o au este sa voteze unul din doi hoti versati o data la 4 ani - asta da putere, cum zicea si masterul mai sus.
Dar uite ca nu putem face doar atat.
Daca sistemul nu functioneaza - il schimbi.
,,
People care deeply about their communities and want to be heard. But a much better way to let the people speak than through a referendum is to return to the central principle of Athenian democracy: drafting by lot, or sortition as it is presently called. In ancient Athens, the large majority of public functions were assigned by lot. Renaissance states such as Venice and Florence worked on the same basis and experienced centuries of political stability. With sortition, you do not ask everyone to vote on an issue few people really understand, but you draft a random sample of the population and make sure they come to the grips with the subject matter in order to take a sensible decision. A cross-section of society that is informed can act more coherently than an entire society that is uninformed.
Experiments with sortition have been successfully applied in the US, Australia, and the Netherlands. The most innovative country so far is certainly Ireland. In December 2012, a constitutional convention began work in order to revise several articles of the constitution of Ireland. Its members were not just a committee of MPs working behind closed doors, but a mixture of elected politicians and ordinary people: 33 elected politicians and 66 citizens, drafted by lot, from both Ireland and Northern Ireland. This group met one weekend per month for more than a year.
An independent research bureau put together the random group of 66 citizens, taking account of age, sex and place of birth. The diversity this produced was helpful when it came to discussing such subjects as same-sex marriage, the rights of women or the ban on blasphemy in the current constitution. However, they did not do all this alone: participants listened to experts and received input from other citizens (more than a thousand contributions came in on the subject of gay marriage). The decisions made by the convention did not have the force of law; the recommendations first had to be passed by the two chambers of the Irish parliament, then by the government and then in a referendum.
By talking to a diverse cross-section of Irish society, politicians could get further than they could have by just talking to each other. By exchanging views with elected officials, citizens could give much more relevant input than they could have in an election or a referendum.''
Sursa: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/29/why-elections-are-bad-for-democracy
Ps: cam asa s-a intamplat, la o scara mai mica, mai mult sau mai putin deliberat, si in Ro cu guvernul tehnocrat.
Diferenta: s-a vazut. Nu poate nimeni sa nege acest lucru. Decat psdistii poate.
.