Ce e aici iti povesteste ce s-a intamplat. Vezi ca unele noduri arata ca unele versiuni au fost pur si simplu pierdute pentru noi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TextsOT.PNG
LXX este Septuagintul crestin.
MT cred ca e vorba de textul Masoretic.
Vechiul Testament a fost rescris de evrei ca nu de romani pana in anul 0. O versiune a fost Septuagintul alta versiune a fost textul Masoretic scris la 1100 de ani dupa.
Pentru ca e mult mai vechi cu 1200+ de ani, Septuagintul este versiunea mai acurata . Am citit ca pentru multe sute de ani Septuagintul a fost folosit de evreii elenizati, care scriau si citeau greceste.
The oldest manuscripts of the LXX include 2nd century BC fragments of Leviticus and Deuteronomy (Rahlfs nos. 801, 819, and 957), and 1st century BC fragments of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, and the Minor Prophets (Rahlfs nos. 802, 803, 805, 848, 942, and 943). Relatively complete manuscripts of the LXX postdate the Hexaplar rescension and include the Codex Vaticanus and the Codex Sinaiticus of the 4th century and the Codex Alexandrinus of the 5th century. These are indeed the oldest surviving nearly complete manuscripts of the Old Testament in any language; the oldest extant complete Hebrew texts date some 600 years later, from the first half of the 10th century.[5][15] While there are differences between these three codices, scholarly consensus today holds that one LXX — that is, the original pre-Christian translation — underlies all three.
Textul asta zice asa. Sunt manuscripte din Septuagint AZI de dinainte de IIsus cu 100 de ani.
Genesis 4:7, LXX (NETS)
If you offer correctly but do not divide correctly, have you not sinned? Be still; his recourse is to you, and you will rule over him.
Genesis 4:7, Masoretic (NRSV)
If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is lurking at the door; its desire is for you, but you must master it.
Genesis 4:7, Latin Vulgate (Douay-Rheims)
If thou do well, shalt thou not receive? but if ill, shall not sin forthwith be present at the door? but the lust thereof shall be under thee, and thou shalt have dominion over it.
This instance illustrates the complexity of assessing differences between the LXX and the Masoretic Text as well as the Vulgate. Despite the striking divergence of meaning here between the Septuagint and later texts, nearly identical consonantal Hebrew source texts can be reconstructed. The readily apparent semantic differences result from alternative strategies for interpreting the difficult verse and relate to differences in vowelization and punctuation of the consonantal text.