BATAIE DE LA PARINTI (ce spune legea?)

Pippo a scris:

A citi si a intelege sunt doua lucruri diverse.

Voi apela la terapie si nu voi mai face copii cand sfaturile tale vor fi rezultatul unei demonstratii matematice. (Nu ma lua cu sentimentele si constiinta ca nu crezi in Dumnezeu, altfel i-ai fi ascultat sfatul si mi-ai fi dat dreptate chiar daca n-ai fi inteles)

Dezgustator. Dar probabil vrei sa atragi atentia asupra ta.

SoareleMeu a scris:

Dezgustator.

Asta-i doar cireasa de pe tort :D

SoareleMeu a scris:

Dar probabil vrei sa atragi atentia asupra ta.

Te-ai prins! Vrei un poster cu explicatiile mele, casete audio-video ceva? :)

Este incredibil ca se poate discuta pe atatea pagini despre justificarile pe care le aduc unii pentru ceea ce li se pare a fi dreptul lor de a-si agresa copiii. :D Tot atat de incredibila este si justificarea cu totul si cu totul absurda ca masonii, bubulii si alte gulgute otravite ne interzic sa folosim violenta asupra unor fapturi carora noi le-am dat viata. :)

Stiut fiind ca adeptii pseudoteoriilor conspirationiste (in general persoane care intampina greutati sociale sau materiale, care au suferit socuri, uneori bolnave incurabil, persoane inadaptabile care isi explica propriile esecuri recurgand la admite posibilitatea existentei unor forte oculte ) isi fac din asemenea aberatii un fel de scut psihologic, e greu, foarte de greu de crezut ca ei stau zi si noapte pe forumuri ( incercand sa ne convinga sa ne batem copiii) fiindca sunt rationale si binevoitoare. Adevarul e mult mai simplu, acesti oameni au impresia ca teoriile respective pot reprezenta explicatia pentru orice. Totodata le ofera si confortul de a fi scutiti de a mai gandi si de a mai fi responsabili. Pozeaza in victime, lor li se intampla toate relele din lume din cauza conspirationistilor, dar adora sa-i victimizeze si pe altii.

Pentru cei care ar putea fi tentati sa faca educatie cu parul fiindca asa au fost sfatuiti pe forum: mai ganditi-va o data! De fapt, e suficient sa ganditi!

Silentia lunae a scris:

De fapt, e suficient sa ganditi!

Uite ca aici ai mare dreptate!

Restul discursului din ce surse? TVR, NBC, CNN, BBC sau direct de la Izvorul Minunilor (Bush Fountain ;) )? :D

PS De ce nu deschizi un topic la psihologie/psihiatrie :cry: pe tema asta sa ne facem de cap acolo? :)

Pippo a scris:

Amin - Apropo, unii spun ca "Amin" provine de la "Amen Ra" si ca ar fi o inchinare pagana... Dar poate este tot o interpretare gresita ca si in cazul copiilor... cine stie...

Posibil. E Amun Ra... :)

clovnii sunt inspaimantatori pentru orice copil normal la cap.

Asta afirmatie e cam trasa de coada si e falsa. Frica de clovni este o conditie numita Coulrophobia si doar unii copii o au,ba chiar si adulti. Asta nu inseamna ca acestia nu-s normali. Este o fobie ca oricare alta.Mi nu mi-a fost frica de clovni niciodata.Acum,cit de normala oi fi la cap,numai Dumnezeu stie. :D

Naeema a scris:

Posibil. E Amun Ra... :D

Multumesc, am observat. Oboseala... Nimeni nu-i perfect :)

Pippo a scris:

Uite ca aici ai mare dreptate!

Restul discursului din ce surse? TVR, NBC, CNN, BBC sau direct de la Izvorul Minunilor (Bush Fountain :cry: )? :D

PS De ce nu deschizi un topic la psihologie/psihiatrie pe tema asta sa ne facem de cap acolo? :)

Nu.Posturile de televiziune si agentiile de stiri precum si apa de la robinet sunt...masonice. ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theories

Study of conspiracism

Belief in conspiracy theories has become a topic of interest for sociologists, psychologists and experts in folklore since at least the 1960s, when the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy eventually provoked an unprecedented public response directed against the official version of the case as expounded in the Report of the Warren Commission.

[edit] Psychological origins

According to some psychologists, a person who believes in one conspiracy theory tends to believe in others; a person who does not believe in one conspiracy theory tends not to believe another.[20] This may be caused by differences in the information upon which parties rely in formulating their conclusions.

Psychologists believe that the search for meaningfulness is common in conspiracism and the development of conspiracy theories, and may be powerful enough alone to lead to the first formulating of the idea[citation needed]. Once cognized, confirmation bias and avoidance of cognitive dissonance may reinforce the belief. In a context where a conspiracy theory has become popular within a social group, communal reinforcement may equally play a part.

Some research carried out at the University of Kent, UK suggests people may be influenced by conspiracy theories without being aware that their attitudes have changed. After reading popular conspiracy theories about the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, participants in this study correctly estimated how much their peers' attitudes had changed, but significantly underestimated how much their own attitudes had changed to become more in favour of the conspiracy theories. The authors conclude that conspiracy theories may therefore have a 'hidden power' to influence people's beliefs.[21]

[edit] Projection

Some historians have pointed out the element of psychological projection in conspiracism; that is, the attribution to the supposed "conspirators" of undesirable characteristics of the self. Richard Hofstadter, in his essay The Paranoid Style in American Politics, stated that:

...it is hard to resist the conclusion that this enemy is on many counts the projection of the self; both the ideal and the unacceptable aspects of the self are attributed to him. The enemy may be the cosmopolitan intellectual, but the paranoid will outdo him in the apparatus of scholarship... the Ku Klux Klan imitated Catholicism to the point of donning priestly vestments, developing an elaborate ritual and an equally elaborate hierarchy. The John Birch Society emulates Communist cells and quasi-secret operation through "front" groups, and preaches a ruthless prosecution of the ideological war along lines very similar to those it finds in the Communist enemy. Spokesmen of the various fundamentalist anti-Communist "crusades" openly express their admiration for the dedication and discipline the Communist cause calls forth.

Hofstadter also noted that "sexual freedom" is a vice frequently attributed to the conspiracist's target group, noting that "very often the fantasies of true believers reveal strong sadomasochistic outlets, vividly expressed, for example, in the delight of anti-Masons with the cruelty of Masonic punishments."[22]

[edit] Epistemic bias

It is possible that certain basic human epistemic biases are projected onto the material under scrutiny. According to one study humans apply a 'rule of thumb' by which we expect a significant event to have a significant cause.[23] The study offered subjects four versions of events, in which a foreign president was (a) successfully assassinated, (b) wounded but survived, © survived with wounds but died of a heart attack at a later date, and (d) was unharmed. Subjects were significantly more likely to suspect conspiracy in the case of the 'major events'

Silentia lunae a scris:

Din pacate wikipedia este tot sub control "oficial". Mai facem off-topic, sau ne mutam la psihiatrie? ;) :) :D

Mama ei de lume, toata controlata de masoni!

Schimbarea Perceptiei oare mai posteaza?

Va invit sa cititi acest articol. Este in engleza.Scuze pentru cei care nu prea inteleg limba dar nu cred ca e cazul la romani,ca noi suntem oameni destepti si le avem cu limbile straine.Mai ales tineretul.

Why are we beating our children? An upsurge in child abuse cases raises new questions

"If a parent swats a child on the bottom, is that abuse? Is it a legitimate concern to question corporal punishment if it leaves scars? What factors have pushed physical abuse reports up 40 percent among Blacks, Whites and other racial groups since 1985?.Although most child care professionals tend to discourage corporal punishment as a primary disciplining tool, many believe that the potential for harm is minimal when mild spankings are coupled with other forms of behavior modification techniques like talking, isolating children for short periods of time-out and using bargaining strategies for a desired behavior. The problem arises, they say, when stressed-out parents, burdened by desperate circumstances, lose control.When these parents strike or paddle their children in a fit of rage, leaving welts, bruises and many times broken bones, they have stepped over the line of what most states would consider an acceptable use of corporal punishment and have entered into the zone of child abuse. And in extreme cases, child abuse is regarded as assault, punishable with up to 15 years in jail."

Articolul complet: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m107...v48/ai_13437203