Poze ce pot fi comentate - pagina 110

hera *26.037 mesajeLun 17 dec 2007 19:17#1091

Interesant,dar din pacate nu pot vedea decat ultimile 3 poze. :cheer:

Infinitus460 mesajeLun 17 dec 2007 19:28#1092

hera * a scris:
Interesant,dar din pacate nu pot vedea decat ultimile 3 poze.

...in ultima vreme face fite site-ul....dar daca dai refreshuri multe....isi da drumul.... :cheer:

hera *26.037 mesajeLun 17 dec 2007 19:45#1093

Infinitus a scris:
...in ultima vreme face fite site-ul....dar daca dai refreshuri multe....isi da drumul....

...am tot dat refreshuri...poate maine le vad si pe celelalte :kiss:

joannahart5.135 mesajeLun 17 dec 2007 21:36#1094

Eu am vazut toate pozele. Intr-adevar foarte interesante.

Chiar as vrea sa citesc parerea unui specialist...... :cheer:

aknetaton589 mesajeMie 19 dec 2007 01:00#1095

Pentru unele imagini iti pot garanta ca le poti face cu ajutorul unei perdele de fum Asupra altora insa, se poate medita.

Infinitus460 mesajeMie 19 dec 2007 01:07#1096

Acesta este procesul prin care Sargel reuseste sa surprinda imagini "astrale".

Pentru cei ce doresc experimentarea cu aparate digitale , acesta este cel mai bun "pont"la ora actuala.

Sargel numeste aceasta tehnica......Breath Technique...

...e in engleza....nu am timp sa o traduc...dar daca vrea neaparat cineva , si nu stie engleza....imi fac timp si traduc...

Breath Tehnique

"Have you ever noticed that in almost every ghost story the apparition always is seen during a rain or thunderstorm? There is a reason for this. Moister from the mist in the atmosphere sticks to these beings when they are close to our reality.

The Endorians first taught me this at the vortex. They would make a horseshoe crab shaped machine appear that spewed out a light moist mist. They would tell me to shoot my camera and near the mist and I would get pictures of beings and they were right. When I asked why this was needed they answered that unless the beings materialized so they could be seen in our spectrum of sight they wouldn't be able to be photographed and I needed a tremendous amount of evidence to present to the public. After only a few nights with the Endorian machine, I figured out by accident that if I blew my breath out about 10 to 15 feet, it would have the same effect and make it so the camera can see the beings.

Now there is a trick you must learn in order to make this technique work. When a camera's button is clicked there is a delay before the picture snaps. What you have to learn is how long it takes your breath to travel at least 10 to 15 feet and time it with the being that's standing there so the breath has passed by and the warm moisture has stuck to the beings body. It took me hundreds of tries before I perfected it. In this respect of a learning curve, digital cameras will work the best because you can take hundreds of pictures without have to spend the time and money for developing.

Most people will scoff at this technique saying that anything can be made out of smoke or floating breath. In the techniques defense you have to see the being as you do it and then your convinced. I don't need moisture to see these beings. I see them all the time day or night, but many people can't. I have seen many times at the vortex the reaction people have when I say there's a being standing to or left and blow out the breath. When the flash explodes the being stuck with moisture can be seen for that split second by everyone and at the4 same time in the flash the smoke from the breath as far surpassed the spot of the being. When all these factors are seen at once by someone they never question the breath technique again, well at least to my face."