Pagina 1 din 1
Cine au fost ABRAHA SI KEBAL ?
#1
Scris 10 January 2008 - 02:22 PM
Buna! am avut un vis cu 2 personaje pe nume abraha si Kebal.As dori sa stiu cine au fost.Am cautat pe google , dar n-am gasit mare lucru
poate stiti voi ceva.Daca vreti povestesc visul ...
#2
Scris 02 May 2008 - 11:36 PM
salut.
abraha, din cate stiu eu a fost un conducator al unei regiuni din Africa in jurul secolelor V-VI, regiune din zona egiptului/etiopiei de azi. el a luptat pt crestinism
cat despre Kebal, nu stiu ce sa zic. s-ar putea referi la KABAL, care nu stiu EXACT ce inseamna, da are legatura cu ideologia iudaica, cu bazele acestei religii.
LE astept sa-l povestesti
abraha, din cate stiu eu a fost un conducator al unei regiuni din Africa in jurul secolelor V-VI, regiune din zona egiptului/etiopiei de azi. el a luptat pt crestinism
cat despre Kebal, nu stiu ce sa zic. s-ar putea referi la KABAL, care nu stiu EXACT ce inseamna, da are legatura cu ideologia iudaica, cu bazele acestei religii.
LE astept sa-l povestesti
#4
Scris 03 May 2008 - 09:54 AM
Si cum i-ai visat pe tipi acestia? Ti-au aparut pe rand si au spus : " Buna! Eu sunt Abraha!... Si eu sunt Kebal!" sau a fost un vis interesant? Povesteste... poate salvam lumea!
#5
Scris 03 May 2008 - 10:21 AM
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:oNzuL...cd=17&gl=ro
Regarding Malay/Indonesian martial arts again: every Silat master knows and is familiar with the ilmus. Whether the master choses to practise it more, or to rely on his own physical art is his choice. In Malay/Indonesian society, a Silat master is expected to know the ilmus, and is expected to know how to deal with the ilmus of any opponent. The more ‘purer’ or ‘austere’ types of Silat, especially if they are influenced by fundamentalist Islam, tend to avoid ‘spiritist’ or paganistic type of ilmus, but concentrate more on human Internal energy (Tenaga Dalam). Still, this is an Ilmu. And even such masters, while denouncing the practice of sorcery, do believe in the existence of such ‘horrid’ practices, and devise counter strategies for them. As a master of Perisai Diri Silat told me personally “In Perisai Diri, we do not have Kebal because we do not believe in Kebal. We use Tenaga Dalam. Other Silat may have Kebal, but we do not believe in it. Kebal is a second rate form of invulnerability. Tenaga Dalam is the best method of invulnerability. Tenaga Dalam can destroy Kebal immediately because we develop strong Internal Energy which can destroy Kebal. Kebal works only if you are not strong enough. Kebal is easily destroyed. If other Silat use Kebal, our Tenaga Dalam will destroy it. So, even though there is Kebal, there is no Kebal as far as Perisai Diri is concerned. We only have Tenaga Dalam. Other Silat may have Kebal, but we have Tenaga Dalam”. I find this to be a more reasonable and educated point of view. This Perisai Diri master is not denying that invulnerability and knocking down does exist, but he is saying that certain invulnerability practices are not reliable and do not work when their ideal conditions are taken away. They may be ‘destroyed’ by a person who has strong Internal Power or strong charisma or by a ‘holy’ person (eg, a priest or a yogi). This is the common belief in Malay/Indonesian Silat circles. Trust the REAL experts on this subject. Do not trust those who have not studied, nor practised the subject matter for decades.
Asta e citat de aici
http://www.yellowbamboohk.com/yellowbamboo...ds%20Dirty.html
Se pare ca este vorba de un termen din artele martiale malaieziene.
"Kebal is a second rate form of invulnerability."
Sper sa iti ajute informatia.
Regarding Malay/Indonesian martial arts again: every Silat master knows and is familiar with the ilmus. Whether the master choses to practise it more, or to rely on his own physical art is his choice. In Malay/Indonesian society, a Silat master is expected to know the ilmus, and is expected to know how to deal with the ilmus of any opponent. The more ‘purer’ or ‘austere’ types of Silat, especially if they are influenced by fundamentalist Islam, tend to avoid ‘spiritist’ or paganistic type of ilmus, but concentrate more on human Internal energy (Tenaga Dalam). Still, this is an Ilmu. And even such masters, while denouncing the practice of sorcery, do believe in the existence of such ‘horrid’ practices, and devise counter strategies for them. As a master of Perisai Diri Silat told me personally “In Perisai Diri, we do not have Kebal because we do not believe in Kebal. We use Tenaga Dalam. Other Silat may have Kebal, but we do not believe in it. Kebal is a second rate form of invulnerability. Tenaga Dalam is the best method of invulnerability. Tenaga Dalam can destroy Kebal immediately because we develop strong Internal Energy which can destroy Kebal. Kebal works only if you are not strong enough. Kebal is easily destroyed. If other Silat use Kebal, our Tenaga Dalam will destroy it. So, even though there is Kebal, there is no Kebal as far as Perisai Diri is concerned. We only have Tenaga Dalam. Other Silat may have Kebal, but we have Tenaga Dalam”. I find this to be a more reasonable and educated point of view. This Perisai Diri master is not denying that invulnerability and knocking down does exist, but he is saying that certain invulnerability practices are not reliable and do not work when their ideal conditions are taken away. They may be ‘destroyed’ by a person who has strong Internal Power or strong charisma or by a ‘holy’ person (eg, a priest or a yogi). This is the common belief in Malay/Indonesian Silat circles. Trust the REAL experts on this subject. Do not trust those who have not studied, nor practised the subject matter for decades.
Asta e citat de aici
http://www.yellowbamboohk.com/yellowbamboo...ds%20Dirty.html
Se pare ca este vorba de un termen din artele martiale malaieziene.
"Kebal is a second rate form of invulnerability."
Sper sa iti ajute informatia.
#7
Scris 03 May 2008 - 11:37 AM
nu tia zis mama ta sa nu vorbesti cu strainii??
povesteste visul, ma bucur ca nu sunt singurul care viseaza ciudat
povesteste visul, ma bucur ca nu sunt singurul care viseaza ciudat
Aceasta postare a fost editata de El`luchador: 03 May 2008 - 12:29 PM
#8
Scris 20 May 2008 - 09:24 PM
AI de capu meu
..si eu am avut un vis erau 2 personaje ......Diavolul si Bunul Dumnezeu
Impartaseste acest subiect:
Pagina 1 din 1
Subiecte similare
| Topic | Deschis de | Replici | Vizualizari | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chestionar: Cati oameni cred in fantome | agame | 1 | 1.456 |
|
Spasmul mioclonic
realitate sau astral? |
XXII | 7 | 5.136 |
|
In toate visele mele este... noapte | Bagherra | 74 | 9.511 |
|
doar pentru cei cu ADN 0
interesanta abordare.... |
XXII | 64 | 10.051 |
|
energie statica | azZzul | 10 | 8.855 |
Contact
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Acest topic e inchis














